About
Apr 13, 2026
How businesses are using digital assets alongside traditional payment infrastructure — and what finance teams need to know before they act.
Last updated: April 2026
This guide explains how digital asset payments — particularly stablecoin-based payment rails — are being used in business today.
It does not assume prior knowledge of blockchain or crypto. It does not assume you should act immediately. What it gives you is a clear, evidence-based picture of where digital assets sit in 2026 — so that any decision you make is an informed one.
The audience is CFOs, treasurers, and finance directors at businesses that move money across borders at scale: financial services firms, payment companies, trading businesses, and globally operating organisations.
For most of the last decade, digital assets were a conversation finance teams could reasonably ignore. The use cases were speculative. The regulation was unclear. The infrastructure was immature.
That has changed — and the shift has been rapid.
In 2025, stablecoins processed an estimated $33 trillion in transaction volume. That figure is comparable to Visa’s annual network. This is no longer a niche market.
Regulation has caught up. The EU’s MiCA framework is live. The FCA has published its digital asset regime. MAS in Singapore and FINTRAC in Canada have clear frameworks in place. The legal environment that previously made digital assets difficult to evaluate is now broadly navigable for regulated businesses.
Adoption is moving beyond crypto-native firms. The businesses now evaluating digital asset rails are financial services companies, payment platforms, and treasury teams — not speculative investors.
And the incumbents have noticed. JPMorgan has JPM Coin in production. Citi is building tokenised deposit infrastructure. SWIFT is running blockchain interoperability pilots. When the largest correspondent banks in the world are building on these rails, the question is no longer whether they become mainstream, but how quickly.
Digital assets are a broad term. In a business payments context, it refers to assets that exist natively on a blockchain — a distributed digital ledger that records transactions without requiring a central intermediary.
Three types are relevant to corporate finance teams:
Cryptocurrencies. Assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum whose value is determined by supply and demand. Their volatility makes them unsuitable as a medium of exchange for most business payment purposes.
Stablecoins. Digital assets pegged to a fiat currency — typically the US dollar. USDC, USDT, and EURC are the most widely used examples. One USDC is designed to be worth one US dollar. Because their value is stable, stablecoins can function as a practical medium of exchange for business payments — combining the speed and programmability of blockchain with the price stability of fiat.
CBDCs (Central Bank Digital Currencies). Digital currencies issued directly by central banks. Several are in pilot or early deployment globally. Their role in corporate treasury is still emerging and not covered in detail in this guide.
This guide focuses on stablecoins — the type of digital asset that has reached operational maturity and is being deployed today by businesses for payment purposes.
A note on stablecoins. A stablecoin peg is maintained by the issuer’s reserve and governance mechanisms. While major stablecoins have strong track records, pegs are not guaranteed. Use established, audited stablecoins with transparent reserve structures.
Traditional cross-border payment infrastructure was built for a different era. Correspondent banking — the network of intermediary banks that facilitate international transfers — has been the backbone of global payments for decades. It works. But it carries constraints that become increasingly visible as businesses scale across borders.
Speed. A standard SWIFT transfer between two international banks typically takes one to five business days. Each correspondent bank in the chain must process, verify, and forward the payment during its own operating hours. A payment routed through two intermediary banks involves two sets of cut-off times and two sets of processing windows.
Cost. Cross-border payment costs vary by corridor, provider, and payment scheme. In correspondent banking chains, fees may apply at each stage, and FX conversion rates vary by provider. For businesses processing high volumes across multiple corridors, understanding the full cost of each payment flow is an important part of treasury management.
Transparency. Once a payment enters the correspondent banking network, visibility narrows. You know when it left. You rarely know exactly where it is or when it will arrive until it does. For finance teams managing cash positions across multiple currencies and jurisdictions, that opacity creates a planning problem.
Availability. Correspondent banking operates within banking hours. Payments instructed on a Friday afternoon may not move until Monday. For businesses with time-sensitive settlement obligations, that gap carries real operational risk.
Pre-funding. To maintain correspondent relationships, banks — and by extension their clients — must prefund nostro accounts in destination currencies. That is capital sitting idle to lubricate the payment network. For businesses with tight treasury management, the prefunding requirement is a direct drag on working capital.
None of this means traditional infrastructure should be replaced. SWIFT, SEPA, Faster Payments, and CHAPS serve billions of transactions reliably every day and remain the right tool for a large proportion of business payments.
The point is not that correspondent banking is broken — it is that it carries constraints that become increasingly visible at scale.
Digital asset rails are emerging alongside traditional systems to address these specific constraints — reducing settlement times, improving transparency, and removing the need for pre-funded capital in certain flows.
For finance teams, the question is no longer whether these systems will coexist — but where they can deliver a meaningful operational advantage.
A stablecoin payment works differently from a traditional bank transfer — but from the business’s perspective, the experience is designed to be similar.
The on-ramp. When a business instructs a payment through a regulated provider, the provider converts the fiat instruction into the equivalent stablecoin. The business sends a normal payment instruction. The provider sources liquidity, performs the conversion, and settles the stablecoin payment on the blockchain. The complexity is abstracted away.
Settlement. When a stablecoin payment is initiated, the transaction is broadcast to the blockchain network. Independent validators verify that the sending wallet has sufficient balance and that the transfer is properly authorised. Once verified, the transaction is recorded on the ledger. Ownership has transferred. Settlement is final — typically within minutes.
The off-ramp. When a stablecoin payment is received, the provider converts it back to fiat and credits the business’s account in their local currency. The business sends and receives fiat. The stablecoin settlement is handled within the provider workflow, while the business continues to send and receive fiat.
Key attributes for business:
A business does not need to understand blockchain mechanics directly. A regulated provider handles custody, compliance, conversion, and settlement.
For finance teams, this means the complexity of digital asset infrastructure can be abstracted — while still delivering faster settlement and improved operational flexibility where it matters.
Stablecoins are not a replacement for all payment infrastructure. They are a complement — suited to specific use cases where their attributes deliver material advantage.
| Rail | Speed | Cost | Availability | Transparency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stablecoins (USDC) | Minutes, 24/7 | Low, fixed | 24/7 | Ledger-based visibility |
| SWIFT | 1–5 business days | Variable, corridor dependent | Business days | Moderate |
| SEPA | Same day (SCT Inst: seconds) | Low | Business hours | Moderate |
| Faster Payments | Seconds | Low | GBP only | Moderate |
| CHAPS | Same day | Fixed per transaction | Business days | Moderate |
The right question is not “stablecoins or traditional rails?” — it is “which rail is most efficient for this specific payment flow?” In practice, most businesses that adopt digital asset rails use them alongside their existing infrastructure — running stablecoin settlement for the flows where speed and availability matter most, and traditional rails for everything else.
Stablecoins are now explicitly regulated in most major financial jurisdictions.
The UK and EU. Under the FCA regime in the UK and MiCA in the EU, stablecoin issuers and payment providers handling digital asset services must be authorised. Requirements cover capital, reserve backing, operational resilience, and reporting. Circle (USDC) holds a MiCA licence. USDC is often viewed as the most operationally suitable option for businesses prioritising reserve transparency and regulatory alignment.
Singapore (MAS). The Monetary Authority of Singapore regulates digital asset businesses under the Payment Services Act. Authorisation is required. Reserve and capital requirements are clear.
Canada (FINTRAC). Canada’s Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre requires money transmitters handling stablecoins to be registered and subject to AML/KYC rules. Clearing’s digital asset services are operated exclusively by Clearing Payments Ltd., our FINTRAC-registered Canadian entity. These services are not FCA or MAS regulated.
What this means operationally. If you are using stablecoins through a regulated provider licensed in your jurisdiction or a major financial centre, you are operating within a clear regulatory framework. That provider has undergone compliance vetting and is subject to ongoing oversight.
Key risks to understand:
The conversation about stablecoins and business payments is no longer theoretical. A growing number of organisations are already using them.
The adoption of digital asset rails is not broad — it is targeted. Businesses introduce them in specific parts of the payment flow where traditional infrastructure creates friction.
Payment platforms with high-frequency cross-border flows have been among the earliest adopters. Where traditional cross-border pipelines create operational bottlenecks at volume — because each payment instruction carries a cost and a processing window — stablecoin settlement removes that constraint. Lower per-transaction friction. Settlement in minutes rather than days.
One multi-currency payments platform serving institutional FX traders began settling a portion of its proprietary trading flows in USDC in 2024. The business moved because its traditional cross-border pipeline was creating operational bottlenecks when volumes exceeded certain thresholds. Stablecoin settlement removed that constraint — enabling faster settlement and removing dependency on intermediary processing windows.
Businesses running multi-party payouts — brokers distributing IB commissions, platforms paying affiliate networks across multiple countries — use stablecoin programmability to settle hundreds of payments in a single smart contract execution rather than hundreds of individual SWIFT instructions.
Treasury operations in businesses with time-sensitive cash management needs — particularly those operating across time zones poorly served by European and US banking cut-off times — use digital asset rails for internal movement of funds outside standard banking hours.
Remittance platforms operating in emerging markets have adopted stablecoin-based settlement where traditional cross-border corridors carry higher costs.
What these businesses share: they already understood their existing infrastructure’s cost and recognised a specific problem that digital asset rails could solve. They did not adopt stablecoins because of interest in crypto. They adopted them because the operational and cost case was clear.
Digital asset rails deliver the most value in specific operating conditions. The use cases where the advantage is clearest:
High-frequency, cross-border settlement. Financial services firms, payment companies, and brokers handling many transactions daily. The per-transaction friction of correspondent banking becomes economically significant at scale.
Time-sensitive settlement windows. Businesses with obligations that must settle outside standard banking hours. When a payment needs to move on a Sunday or settle before a Monday market open, 24/7 availability removes a meaningful operational risk.
High-volume, multi-party payouts. A platform paying commissions to many partners across multiple countries simultaneously. Stablecoin programmability allows that to happen in a single execution rather than many individual instructions.
Multi-currency treasury management. Businesses holding accounts across multiple currencies and jurisdictions where speed of internal movement and transparency of position matters.
Emerging market corridors. In jurisdictions where banking infrastructure is less mature or where traditional cross-border corridors carry higher costs, stablecoin settlement may offer better rates and faster processing.
Not every business fits these profiles. A business sending one or two international payments per month to stable banking partners benefits little from stablecoins — the operational complexity would outweigh the gain.
The advantage is situational — and becomes meaningful when payment volume, timing, or infrastructure constraints begin to impact operations.
The right provider should reduce operational complexity, not add to it. Key criteria:
Regulation and authorisation. Is the provider FCA-authorised, MAS-licensed, or equivalent? Do they hold a FINTRAC registration for digital asset services? Avoid unregulated providers regardless of pricing.
Reserve and custody. Are funds held in segregated, safeguarded accounts with clear legal separation from the provider’s own assets? Obtain documentation of the custody and reserve structure.
Stablecoin and network choice. Which stablecoins does the provider offer? USDC is the most defensible choice for a regulated business. Which blockchains? Ethereum is the most established and liquid.
On/off ramp capability. Can they reliably convert fiat to stablecoin and back at your expected volume? What are the pricing and minimum transaction sizes?
Integration and APIs. Do they offer APIs for integration into your accounting and payment systems? Can they provide transaction records in a format compatible with your financial systems?
Compliance infrastructure. Do they support AML/KYC screening, sanctions screening, Travel Rule compliance, and regulatory reporting?
Support. Can you reach a human? Is there 24/5 or 24/7 support? In financial services, timely support matters.
Track record. How long have they been operating? Do they have institutional clients? Can you verify references?
Fee transparency. What are the on-ramp/off-ramp spreads and any other costs? Do they vary by volume or corridor?
Integration does not require replacing existing infrastructure. It requires identifying the right use case and building from there.
In most cases, businesses adopt digital asset rails incrementally — layering them into existing payment workflows rather than replacing them entirely.
Start with a specific use case. Do not attempt to migrate all cross-border payments to stablecoins. Identify one corridor, one payment type, or one operational constraint where digital asset rails offer a clear advantage. Start there.
Run a pilot. Agree a test period with your provider. Define success criteria — settlement speed, cost per transaction, operational overhead. Measure against your current baseline.
Governance and approvals. Most businesses require board or finance committee sign-off to add a new payment infrastructure. Stablecoin integration should go through the same approval process as adding a new bank account or payment partner. The questions to answer: Does the provider hold appropriate authorisation? Are funds safeguarded? What is the audit trail and reconciliation capability?
Accounting treatment. Stablecoin transactions should be recorded in your accounting system the same way as traditional payments. Most businesses do not hold stablecoins on-balance-sheet — the stablecoin leg is internal to the payment flow, and the business sends and receives fiat.
Onboarding timeline. A regulated provider will require standard onboarding: proof of identity, beneficial ownership, business verification, AML/KYC checks. This typically takes one to three weeks.
Contingency planning. Ensure that if the stablecoin corridor is unavailable, your business can revert to traditional infrastructure without critical disruption. Digital asset rails should augment your payment stack, not create a single point of failure.
For many finance teams, these are the final practical questions before deciding whether to explore a pilot.
Do we need to hold cryptocurrency on our balance sheet?
No. A regulated provider handles the conversion between fiat and stablecoin. Your business sends and receives fiat. The stablecoin settlement happens within the provider’s infrastructure.
Is this regulated?
Yes — in the jurisdictions covered by this guide. FCA (UK), MAS (Singapore), MiCA (EU), and FINTRAC (Canada) all have explicit frameworks for digital asset payment services. Using a regulated provider means operating within a clear legal framework.
How long does onboarding take?
Typically one to three weeks, depending on business complexity. The process is similar to opening a new bank account — identity verification, beneficial ownership, AML/KYC checks.
What happens if the stablecoin loses its peg?
Major stablecoins like USDC are backed by dollar-denominated assets held at regulated financial institutions and publish regular reserve attestations. Isolated de-pegging events have occurred with smaller stablecoins. Using established, audited stablecoins with regulatory backing substantially mitigates this risk.
Can we use this for any currency?
Most stablecoin settlement uses USD-denominated stablecoins (USDC). Euro stablecoins (EURC) are available. Your provider converts your local currency to the stablecoin and back at the other end — so the stablecoin denomination is largely transparent to the business.
How does this fit with our existing payment infrastructure?
Digital asset rails are designed to complement, not replace, existing infrastructure. Most businesses run them alongside SWIFT, SEPA, and Faster Payments — using stablecoin settlement for the specific flows where speed or cost makes the difference.
Clearing is a regulated financial services business operating at the intersection of traditional payments and digital assets. We provide global businesses — from ambitious scale-ups to institutional clients — with a single platform for multi-currency accounts, international payments, FX, and digital asset infrastructure.
Fiat payment services are provided by WTUK Limited (FCA-authorised) and WTSG PTE. LTD. (MAS-licensed). Digital asset services, including on/off ramp and stablecoin settlement, are provided exclusively by Clearing Payments Ltd., our FINTRAC-registered Canadian entity. Digital asset services are not FCA or MAS regulated and are subject to availability and eligibility in your jurisdiction.
Client funds are held in segregated and safeguarded accounts.
If you would like to assess whether digital asset payment rails are appropriate for your business, contact our team via clearing.com.
This content is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity. It does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, or a recommendation to acquire any financial instrument or product. Digital asset values can be volatile and stablecoin pegs, while designed to be stable, are not guaranteed. Businesses should take independent legal, financial, and regulatory advice appropriate to their specific circumstances before implementing digital asset payment infrastructure. Digital asset services described herein are provided by Clearing Payments Ltd. under a FINTRAC registration in Canada and are not regulated by the FCA or MAS.
Important — who provides what: Fiat payment services (multi-currency accounts, international payments, FX) are provided by WTUK Limited (trading as Clearing), authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) under the Electronic Money Regulations 2011, and by WTSG PTE. LTD., licensed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). Digital asset services — including on/off ramp and stablecoin settlement — are provided exclusively by Clearing Payments Ltd., a money services business and virtual asset service provider registered with FINTRAC in Canada. Digital asset services are not FCA or MAS regulated and are subject to availability and eligibility in your jurisdiction. This communication is not an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity.
RailSpeedCostAvailabilityTransparencyStablecoins (USDC)Minutes, 24/7Low, fixedAlways onFull on-chainSWIFT1–5 business daysVariable, corridor dependentBusiness daysModerateSEPASame day (SCT Inst: seconds)LowBusiness hoursModerateFaster PaymentsSecondsLowGBP onlyModerateCHAPSSame dayFixed per transactionBusiness daysModerate